<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Carbon Tax or Carbon Trading?</title>
		<description>Comments for Carbon Tax or Carbon Trading? at http://www.theenergyindependent.com , comment 1 to 1 out of 1 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.theenergyindependent.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:43:42 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theenergyindependent.com/backgrounders/carbon-tax-or-carbon-trading.html#comment-6</link>
			<description>Until the US jumps on-board with rest of the world for carbon-caps, I think RECs will continue to strengthen their reputation as the pollution &quot;off-setter&quot; in the US (Whole Foods has offset their entire operation with wind-power RECs for example).  I wrote about RECs in more detail here.

In terms of pricing carbon credits, I think the price should be structured by making it more expensive to purchase the credits than it is modify your industrial systems to lower emissions on a DCF (discounted cash flow) basis.  This would be a little more complex as the needs and costs to change systems vary by industry, but it would incentivize industries to change quicker.  

While it is a terrific idea that governments would use the tax revenue to pay for research and development in alternative energy/emissions systems, we have seen what the US govt has done with the majority of its tax revenue (Iraq).  Influencing the bottom line of greedy companies might be a better way to get them to jump on-board the &quot;green&quot; wagon.  

Simply put, if purchasing carbon credits will cost a company $20 in present value for the next 5 year, but installing new systems to reduce carbon emissions will cost them $15-$20 in present value, plus they have the right to sell excess carbon credits and claim &quot;green&quot; company status, I do not see why they wouldn't opt for the purchase.  This can be compared to a rent vs. buy situation most encounter when considering a purchase of a new home.  Rent could be cheaper today, but the price will change depending on the market.  Purchasing a home locks you into a fixed (usually...) interest rate and allows you to predict your costs over time without volatility.

There is a lot of money to be made in both the private and government sector here. The US is definitely leaving money on the table until we do.

I comment regularly on the business/investor side of alternative energy on Energy Spin: Alternative Energy Blog for Investors-Served Daily

Cheers,
Francesco DeParis
 - Francesco DeParis</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 08:01:42 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
